FWIW, the policy spec has an open issue to consider how to
describe intents that have such a relationship. It's similar to the
idea of a profile intent, but the semantics for matching wires
would be slightly different.
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-22
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany MTOM
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
I think it would be great to support MTOM.
[snip]
> We could do that using intents the same way as the support for SOAP
1.2 is done and the scdl would look something like:
<binding.ws requires="MTOM" />
+1 to use a policy, but I have a question: doesn't SOAP 1.2 imply
"enable MTOM"?
if yes --> we should just use the soap12 intent to enable MTOM
if no --> we need a specific MTOM policy
Some resources:
- Comments about MTOM on the WSDL 1.1 SOAP 1.2 binding
http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/05/Comment
- MTOM WS policy working draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-mtom-policy/
- WSDL 2.0 showing enablement of MTOM in the WSDL
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-primer-20050803/#adv-MTOM
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
