On Jan 4, 2008 8:56 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote: > [snip] > > I think it would be great to support MTOM. > [snip] > > > We could do that using intents the same way as the support for SOAP > > 1.2 is done and the scdl would look something like: > > > > <binding.ws requires="MTOM" /> > > > > +1 to use a policy, but I have a question: doesn't SOAP 1.2 imply > "enable MTOM"? > > if yes --> we should just use the soap12 intent to enable MTOM > if no --> we need a specific MTOM policy > > Some resources: > - Comments about MTOM on the WSDL 1.1 SOAP 1.2 binding > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/05/Comment > > - MTOM WS policy working draft > http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-mtom-policy/ > > - WSDL 2.0 showing enablement of MTOM in the WSDL > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-primer-20050803/#adv-MTOM > > Its is also possible to use MTOM with SOAP 1.1 and we need a way to enable that. and its also conceivable that you may want to use SOAP 1.2 without MTOM - maybe the remote system doesn't support MTOM but does require SOAP 1.2. So i think we do need the new separate MTOM policy intent to control this. ...ant
