Hmm... seems like I am missing something then... alright let me ask you this way...
if SCADefintions is going to contain a list of JMSBinding definitions.. won't in end up something like this... public interface SCADefinitions { List<Intent> getPolicyIntents(); List<JMSBinding> getJmsBindingDefs(); ... } Now to get the class 'JMSBinding' mustn't the definitions module include the binding-jms module as dependency ? - Venkat On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > > > If the SCADefinitions model must hold jms binding definitions, I guess > it > > must add the jms binding as a dependency. > > Good news, it doesn't need to :) > > This is similar to the assembly model holding JMS binding definitions > for example, without having a dependency on the JMS binding. > > Or am I missing something? > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >