Yes that makes clear simple sense. Really lost it, I must say. Thanks :)
- Venkat
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Hmm... seems like I am missing something then... alright let me ask you
> this
> > way...
> >
> > if SCADefintions is going to contain a list of JMSBinding definitions..
> > won't in end up something like this...
> >
> > public interface SCADefinitions {
> > List<Intent> getPolicyIntents();
> > List<JMSBinding> getJmsBindingDefs();
> > ...
> >
> > }
> >
> > Now to get the class 'JMSBinding' mustn't the definitions module include
> the
> > binding-jms module as dependency ?
> >
>
> No :) like Service lists Bindings (including JMSBindings) without a
> dependency on the JMS binding module.
>
> You just need to define SCADefinitions as follows:
> public interface SCADefinitions {
> List<Intent> getPolicyIntents();
> List<Binding> getBindings();
> }
>
> Does this helps?
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
