Kevin Williams wrote:
I'd like to add an annotated version of the SCA Java Common
Annotations and APIs specification somewhere in the project so that I
can reference individual functional requirements from the tests. Does
it make sense to add this as an attachment to the Java SCA
Documentation wiki page?
If the references are from the tests to the spec, it should be
possible to use spec line numbers and not modify the spec.
Is there some problem with this?
Simon
Thanks,
--Kevin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific
functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do
this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of
the specs.
Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the project?
Thanks,
--Kevin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for
> > verification testing against the specification set. I believe it
> > would add value to the project and may also be a place where
> > developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a
> > reasonable idea?
> > Thanks,
> > --Kevin
> >
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
