I think that named annotations would be more clear since there is not
a direct mapping from line number to compliance point.  A compliance
point may cover n lines or a single line may have n compliance points.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Williams wrote:
>  > I'd like to add an annotated version of the SCA Java Common
>  > Annotations and APIs specification somewhere in the project so that I
>  > can reference individual functional requirements from the tests.  Does
>  > it make sense to add this as an attachment to the Java SCA
>  > Documentation wiki page?
>  >
>  If the references are from the tests to the spec, it should be
>  possible to use spec line numbers and not modify the spec.
>  Is there some problem with this?
>
>    Simon
>
>
>
>  > Thanks,
>  >
>  > --Kevin
>  >
>  > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific
>  >>  functional requirements from the specifications.  The best way to do
>  >>  this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of
>  >>  the specs.
>  >>
>  >>  Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the 
> project?
>  >>
>  >>  Thanks,
>  >>
>  >>  --Kevin
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
>  >>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  > +1
>  >>  >
>  >>  >  ++Vamsi
>  >>  >
>  >>  >  On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>  >  wrote:
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >  > I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for
>  >>  >  > verification testing against the specification set.  I believe it
>  >>  >  > would add value to the project and may also be a place where
>  >>  >  > developers new to Tuscany might contribute.  Does this sound like a
>  >>  >  > reasonable idea?
>  >>  >  > Thanks,
>  >>  >  > --Kevin
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to