A new SDO 1.1 RC4 is available at http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4, could anyone do a quick sanity check review before I call a release vote on this?
...ant On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thats excellent Adriano. I'll go merge this into the 1.1 branch and respin > an RC now. > > ...ant > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Adriano Crestani < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Ant, > > > > The bug is fixed on revision 643224 ; ) > > > > Adriano Crestani > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:56 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Adriano Crestani < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean > > > > you're > > > > working on a fix (which would be great!)? Anyone have any pointers > > to > > > > help > > > > fix it? The jira has been open for over 6 months already so is > > anyone > > > > actually saying its a blocker for this 1.1 release? > > > > > > > > Yes, I'm trying to fix it : ). And I think it's not a blocker, cause > > > > it's not so relevant, since it blocks only in few cases that are > > > > env-dependent. So, for me it's ok if we add this fix only on next > > release. > > > > > > > > > > Does that email from Frank over on the SDO Date Format thread get you > > > closer? I'm still happy hold of the repsin if you think you're likely > > to get > > > a fix for this done soon. > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > >
