Hi, Ant.
I had to fix TUSCANY-2187 which broke the build on Windows with SUN JDK
1.5.x. The commit is r644071.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:12 AM
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
A new SDO 1.1 RC4 is available at
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4, could anyone do a
quick sanity check review before I call a release vote on this?
...ant
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thats excellent Adriano. I'll go merge this into the 1.1 branch and
respin
an RC now.
...ant
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Adriano Crestani <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> The bug is fixed on revision 643224 ; )
>
> Adriano Crestani
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:56 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Adriano Crestani <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean
> > > you're
> > > working on a fix (which would be great!)? Anyone have any pointers
> to
> > > help
> > > fix it? The jira has been open for over 6 months already so is
> anyone
> > > actually saying its a blocker for this 1.1 release?
> > >
> > > Yes, I'm trying to fix it : ). And I think it's not a blocker,
> > > cause
> > > it's not so relevant, since it blocks only in few cases that are
> > > env-dependent. So, for me it's ok if we add this fix only on next
> release.
> > >
> >
> > Does that email from Frank over on the SDO Date Format thread get you
> > closer? I'm still happy hold of the repsin if you think you're likely
> to get
> > a fix for this done soon.
> >
> > ...ant
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
