On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote: > > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > > > > scabooz wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > > > +1 for warnings when the application is developed. +1 for Errors > > > > when > > > > you put the application into production. The trick is to know the > > > > difference > > > > between deployment for UT vs. deployment for real. > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > And the other trick is to allow processing of artifacts with errors to > > > proceed as well in dev, debug and admin scenarios as well. > > > > > > For example we should be able to load a composite with errors in it, > > > in the admin tool, to show these errors to the administrator and allow him > > > to fix them. > > > > > > Basically it's the same idea as a with Java editor. A Java editor that > > > wouldn't allow you to edit Java classes with errors wouldn't be very > > > useful > > > :) > > > > > > That means: Not throwing an exception that stops everything on the > > > first error, but instead report errors through the monitors that we > > > already > > > have in various places in the code. > > > > > > I agree with this statement that everything should not stop on the > > first > > error. To reuse my compiler analogy, I wouldn't like the compiler to > > report only one error every time I run it. > > > > However, this doesn't mean that the faulty class should only produce a > > warning that allows execution to proceed. It should still produce an > > error that causes deployment of this application to fail, but the error > > should be handled in a way that allows it to be batched with other > > similar errors to give the user a consolidated failure report. > > > > Simon > > > > OK that's fair. I still think that preventing any 'deployment' is too > strong, but I can live with it for now and we'll see over time how that > evolves. > > I agree too, thats exactly the type of thing i had in mind. Looks like we might all be able to reach some consensus after all :) ...ant
