Simon Laws wrote:
I'm +1 on this. Comments in line
Simon.
- Continue with SCA 1.x maintenance releases based on the current SCA
1.2 branch. This would be a more stable codebase, and we should avoid
big changes that could brake backward compatibility here.
I propose that we create the branch for 1.x develop directly after 1.2 is
out to make clear our intentions. It's not clear if the suggestion here is
to create sca-java-1.X or sca-java-1.3. My vote would be for the latter
(reserving sca-java-1.2.1 in case we need to address specific concerns in
1.2 that are not subject to ongoing maintenance activities).
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out of trunk?
I'm asking because I'm interested in working on some improvements of 1.2
in the next few weeks. This shouldn't delay any 2.0 work however, which
can go in parallel.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
