Hi,

+1  for moving the trunk to 2.0 and working on all the changes that we have
been wanted to make to the SPIs, distribution packaging, runtimes etc.

+1 for having 1.2 as maintenance branch and keeping it stable.  Any
improvements keeping this as base could continue on the branch and maybe if
our 2.0 release if going to take a while, we could make some 1.2.x sort of
minor releases.  Since the branch has been cleaned up the release work for
these should hopefully be less too.

+1 for keeping the same space for the docs but create a separate stream of
docs for version 2 specific things.  This is 'option 2' in the proposal
related to documentation.

Thanks

- Venkat

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:28 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  <snip>
> >
> >
> > +1.  Many of the items suggested for 2.0 have previously been the
> >  > subject of discussions that have not been easy to close.  Until
> >  > we have agreement on how to approach these things, I think it's
> >  > better for 2.0 development to happen in an "investigative" branch.
> >  > Doing this will allow us to try different approaches and see
> >  > which we prefer, without causing a lot of churn to the trunk.
> >  >
> >
> >  So based on the comments so far I think we should hold off on moving to
> 2.0
> >  for now.
>
> +1, let's get consensus first.
>
> >
> >  That said I'm extremely wary of the having work going on in
> "investigative"
> >  branches, given Tuscany's history of branches and forks I really really
> hope
> >  this doesn't happen much and we'd instead all try to work together in
> the
> >  trunk.
> >
>
> +1
>
> >    ...ant
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to