Hi Hasan On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Hasan Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Simon, > > I dont think using an underlying tuscany jdk logger would be useful to > plugins as they may not want to log, rather show it somewhere else such as > console etc. Agreed. Thinking about this some more it is also bad as we may not have control of the loggers that and embedding system uses. > Tuscany can use an underlying logger in it's own monitor ( as > it uses today). But i think the first approach of using a monitor is > better > along with the condition that it be made more usable by the plugins by > giving them greater control. Yep > > > Another point is that tuscany should use ResourceBundle for validation > messages as well. I dont think this is being done today. +1 So I'm making a itest for validation cases. I'm starting with the one you kicked off with, i.e. the schema validation one. Have you got any other scenarios in mind?
