Thanks for all the feedback. I have merged the fixes for TUSCANY-2220 and TUSCANY-2214, and I'm processing a new Release Candidate.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luciano Resende wrote: > > > Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for > Java. > > > > The artifacts are available for review at: > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/ > > > > This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, > > and the Maven staging repository. > > > > The eclipse updatesite for the Tuscany Eclipse plugins is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/updatesite/ > > > > The release tag is available at : > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2-RC3b/ > > > > > > Looks OK to me, here is my +1. > > > > > I am -1 on releasing SCA Java 1.2 RC3b, because of the problem > with TUSCANY-2220. > > I understand that we could produce a patch for this (a replacement > binding-ws-axis2.jar and a source patch file). However, it doesn't > look good for us to have to explain to everyone downloading 1.2 > in binary or source form that they must apply the patch before > using or building 1.2, and it's a nuisance for all the users to > have to do this. Some users probably won't get this right and > they will have problems with 1.2 as a result. > > More seriously, for anyone downloading 1.2 from the maven repos, > the patch approach doesn't work. This was the issue that made me > decide to vote -1 rather than -0.5. > > Simon > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
