Well, after really multiple times (about 5 or 6) I got a sucessful build. But how would our users feel by experiencing this issue ?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:35 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So thats works ok for two, doesn't work for one. > > Luciano, I had to build a couple of times with -U to get all the emf jars > successfully downloaded, have you tried that or can you find any other way > to get a build through in your environment? > > ...ant > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Murtaza Goga > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I built this release last night, built clean. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:29 AM >> To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release SDO 1.1.1 >> >> I'd like to get this voted on and released but nervous to start that >> after >> Kelvin had trouble getting the emf dependencies, could any one else try >> building the tag and seeing if it works or not for them - >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1.1-R >> C2/- >> its a small checkout and doesn't take long to build. >> >> ...ant >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:15 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > It seems to work fine for me, the binary distribution ends up with a >> lib >> > folder containing: >> > >> > backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar >> > codegen-2.2.3.jar >> > codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar >> > common-2.2.3.jar >> > ecore-2.2.3.jar >> > ecore-change-2.2.3.jar >> > ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar >> > sample-sdo-1.1.1.jar >> > stax-api-1.0.1.jar >> > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1-1.1.1.jar >> > tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1.1.jar >> > tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1.1.jar >> > tuscany-sdo-tools-1.1.1.jar >> > wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar >> > xsd-2.2.3.jar >> > >> > I've put the distributions that I get from the 1.1.1-RC2 tag up at >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC2<http://people.a >> pache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC2>, >> > how do they look? >> > >> > ...ant >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:18 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Luciano, >> >> yes, I added that workaround, and that satisfied most of the EMF >> jars, >> >> but not these two. It's odd, the 2 jars we need are there in the >> >> repository >> >> you suggested, but maven will not download them. >> >> >> >> Kelvin. >> >> >> >> 2008/6/6 Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> > Did you try the workaround I mentioned before on this thread [1] >> where >> >> > I added a new repository ? It was actually for other jars, but >> might >> >> > help in this case as well... >> >> > >> >> > [1] >> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg31727.html >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM, kelvin goodson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > I've made all the changes required in the tag [1] to get rid of >> the >> >> felix >> >> > > jars, find and include the emf jars, and I've removed the >> incubating >> >> > tag, >> >> > > DISCLAIMER files etc. However, I'm currently stumped as to why >> two >> >> emf >> >> > > jars available [2] and [3] don't get downloaded by the build. >> The >> >> build >> >> > > output complains about URLs that, if cut and pasted into a >> browser, >> >> work >> >> > > fine. Any clues to explain this odd maven behaviour are welcome. >> >> > > >> >> > > Kelvin >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > [1] >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1.1-R >> C2/ >> >> > > [2] >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/eclipse/modeling/emf/emf/maven2/org/eclipse/emf/c >> odegen/2.2.3/ >> >> > > [3] >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/eclipse/modeling/emf/emf/maven2/org/eclipse/emf/c >> odegen-ecore/2.2.3/ >> >> > > >> >> > > 2008/6/3 Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > > >> >> > >> Kelvin, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Sorry about the delay in getting back to you - I can see that >> you >> >> have >> >> > >> found >> >> > >> a solution. Yes, you are absolutely right, the felix framework >> should >> >> > use >> >> > >> scope "provided" since SdoBundleActivator is only used when SDO >> is >> >> > running >> >> > >> inside an OSGi container, and the framework classes are provided >> by >> >> the >> >> > >> container. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On 6/3/08, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Just a thought, would I be right in guessing that if ever our >> >> > >> > SdoBundleActivator is touched in the runtime, then the >> environment >> >> > would >> >> > >> > be >> >> > >> > expected to provide the classes to satisfy >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > import org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator; >> >> > >> > import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext; >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > ? >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > in which case I think declaring a "provided" scope for the >> felix >> >> > >> dependency >> >> > >> > would be the right way to do things >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > Thanks Ant, that looks like progress, but the felix >> framework >> >> jar >> >> > is >> >> > >> > now >> >> > >> > > not in the list of distributed jars. >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > 2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > Adding an exclude for felix to the distribution pom can fix >> that, >> >> eg >> >> > >> > here's >> >> > >> > >> local changes i have just tried: >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> Index: src/main/assembly/bin.xml >> >> > >> > >> >> >> =================================================================== >> >> > >> > >> --- src/main/assembly/bin.xml (revision 662488) >> >> > >> > >> +++ src/main/assembly/bin.xml (working copy) >> >> > >> > >> @@ -120,13 +120,13 @@ >> >> > >> > >> <dependencySets> >> >> > >> > >> <dependencySet> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> <outputDirectory>tuscany-sdo-${sdo.version}/lib</outputDirectory> >> >> > >> > >> - <includes> >> >> > >> > >> - >> >> > >> > >> >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include> >> >> > >> > >> + <!-- includes> >> >> > >> > >> + >> >> > >> > >> >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-lib</include> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-impl</include> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-tools</include> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:sample-sdo</include> >> >> > >> > >> - </includes> >> >> > >> > >> + </includes --> >> >> > >> > >> <fileMode>0644</fileMode> >> >> > >> > >> </dependencySet> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> Index: pom.xml >> >> > >> > >> >> >> =================================================================== >> >> > >> > >> --- pom.xml (revision 662488) >> >> > >> > >> +++ pom.xml (working copy) >> >> > >> > >> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ >> >> > >> > >> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId> >> >> > >> > >> <artifactId>tuscany-sdo-impl</artifactId> >> >> > >> > >> <version>${pom.version}</version> >> >> > >> > >> + <exclusions> >> >> > >> > >> + <exclusion> >> >> > >> > >> + <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> >> >> > >> > >> + >> >> <artifactId>org.apache.felix.main</artifactId> >> >> > >> > >> + </exclusion> >> >> > >> > >> + </exclusions> >> >> > >> > >> </dependency> >> >> > >> > >> <dependency> >> >> > >> > >> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId> >> >> > >> > >> @@ -67,6 +73,7 @@ >> >> > >> > >> <artifactId>sample-sdo</artifactId> >> >> > >> > >> <version>${pom.version}</version> >> >> > >> > >> </dependency> >> >> > >> > >> + >> >> > >> > >> </dependencies> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> <build> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> Which results in a lib directory containing: >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar >> >> > >> > >> codegen-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> common-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> sample-sdo-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> > >> stax-api-1.0.1.jar >> >> > >> > >> tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> > >> tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> > >> tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> > >> tuscany-sdo-tools-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > >> > >> wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar >> >> > >> > >> xsd-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> ...ant >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kelvin goodson < >> >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > I had an offline chat with Rajini. It seems we need just >> the >> >> > >> > framework >> >> > >> > >> jar >> >> > >> > >> > of felix in the distro, but if the dependency on felix >> is >> >> > declared >> >> > >> as >> >> > >> > >> test >> >> > >> > >> > scope in the pom, then that jar is not available to main >> >> phase >> >> > of >> >> > >> the >> >> > >> > >> > build. If its not declared as test scope then we get 5 >> felix >> >> > jars >> >> > >> in >> >> > >> > >> the >> >> > >> > >> > binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she >> gets >> >> some >> >> > >> time. >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> The felix jars were introduced in the fix for "SDO does >> not >> >> > work >> >> > >> > with >> >> > >> > >> >> OSGi" [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is >> >> > expected >> >> > >> > >> >> behaviour, not being an OSGI expert. Comments anyone? >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293 >> >> > >> > >> >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=620763 >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> The required libraries are >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> codegen-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> ecore-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> common-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> xsd-2.2.3.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> stax-api-1.0.1.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> with >> >> > >> > >> >>> backport-util-concurrent being optional if you want >> >> threadsafe >> >> > >> > >> >>> collections with Java 1.4 IIRC >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> The felix jar inclusions were introduced some time >> between >> >> > commit >> >> > >> > >> level >> >> > >> > >> >>> 600913 and 627754; I'm working on narrowing this down >> at >> >> the >> >> > >> > moment. >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> 2008/6/2 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> It is strange. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly >> >> bin.xml >> >> > >> > changes >> >> > >> > >> it >> >> > >> > >> >>>> so >> >> > >> > >> >>>> that the dependencies do get included again, but >> several >> >> felix >> >> > >> > >> >>>> dependencies >> >> > >> > >> >>>> also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars >> that >> >> > >> should >> >> > >> > be >> >> > >> > >> >>>> included? >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> ...ant >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson < >> >> > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and >> the >> >> > >> 2.2-beta-1 >> >> > >> > >> >>>> version. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, >> which >> >> I >> >> > >> > haven't >> >> > >> > >> >>>> found in >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > a repository yet, so the only version that seems >> ever to >> >> > have >> >> > >> > >> worked >> >> > >> > >> >>>> is >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > the >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the >> assembly >> >> > >> plugin >> >> > >> > >> >>>> JIRAs, >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > but >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs >> reference the >> >> > word >> >> > >> > >> >>>> dependency. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a >> freak >> >> bug >> >> > that >> >> > >> > was >> >> > >> > >> to >> >> > >> > >> >>>> our >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all >> the >> >> > other >> >> > >> > >> >>>> versions >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > have >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > a bug/bugs. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > I have pinned down the change that caused the >> absence >> >> of >> >> > EMF >> >> > >> > jars >> >> > >> > >> in >> >> > >> > >> >>>> the >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven >> >> assembly >> >> > >> > plugin >> >> > >> > >> >>>> version >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here >> [1]. >> >> I >> >> > hope >> >> > >> > to >> >> > >> > >> >>>> look at >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If >> anyone >> >> has >> >> > >> any >> >> > >> > >> views >> >> > >> > >> >>>> on >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > what >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > version we should be using please pipe up. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > [1] >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=62869 >> 1&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the >> samples >> >> at >> >> > >> the >> >> > >> > >> >>>> moment. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using >> IBM JDK >> >> > 1.5 >> >> > >> and >> >> > >> > >> >>>> maven >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > 2.0.7 >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> I got hit by >> >> > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135when >> >> > >> > >> >>>> trying >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > to >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc >> that >> >> > 2.0.7 >> >> > >> is >> >> > >> > >> OK, >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > perhaps >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in >> order to >> >> > avoid >> >> > >> > IBM >> >> > >> > >> JDK >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > users >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9 >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Kelvin. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> The artifacts including binary and source >> >> distributions, >> >> > >> > >> staging >> >> > >> > >> >>>> maven >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> repo >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> and release notes are available at >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people. >> apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> < >> >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> > >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> < >> >> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > < >> >> > http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> < >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/ >> >> > >> > >. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 >> release >> >> is >> >> > the >> >> > >> > fix >> >> > >> > >> >>>> for >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> +1 from me. >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> ...ant >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> -- >> >> > >> Thank you... >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Regards, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Rajini >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Luciano Resende >> >> > Apache Tuscany Committer >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> < >> >> http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
