Sure, I think what we could do for a post-M2 is also the dynamic creation
and population of the companyWeb database, similar to what BigBank account
services does, that makes deployment as simple as deploying the war file
into the app server and it works... no extra setup is needed. I can create a
JIRA for that if people are OK with this change for the future...

- Luciano


On 10/11/06, Brent Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Luciano,

I don't think including Derby is a must-have for M2, though it would
be nice to avoid having that extra setup step. It's not worth holding
a release.

Brent

On 10/11/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brent
>
>   I spent little more time around your comments, and I'm trying to
address
> them to a possible DAS RC3.
>   See my comments below :
>
> >>2) The appendix in the readme.htm is out of date. It
> >>mentions some file locations for step 4, but there is no
> >>longer a step 4 and the locations are irrelevant now that
> >>we don't need to copy these files.
>
> Item 4 describes only derby.jar file to be copied to TC installation.
The
> appendix have a list of all dependencies files, and explicitly have a
note
> saying that CompanyWeb have all dependencies in WEB-INF\lib except for
the
> derby one. I'm creating a patch to get it a little more clear, but I was
> planning to leave the list of dependencies on the appendix.
>
> >>4) Should the sample webapp include the derby jar? It
> >> seems reasonable since we are including SDO, EMF,
> >> etc. It would be nice if we didn't require users to copy
> >> this over.
>
> Regarding including derby, do you think this is a MUST ? The
documentation
> is already addressing the necessary steps to get derby configured and
even
> if you include the jar, you still have to go and configure the
dataSource.
>
> - Luciano Resende
>
>
> On 10/11/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the quick feedback...
> > My comments inline
> >
> >
> > On 10/11/06, Brent Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Luciano,
> > >
> > > Just took a quick look at this. I havn't gone through and tried to
run
> > > anything yet but I did notice a few things (I can look into fixing
> > > some of these later.)
> > >
> > > 1) The RC2 files are named M2-SNAPSHOT rather than M2-RC2.. Not
really
> > > a big deal but we should maintain consistency here.
> >
> >
> >
> > This is following the same naming as SDO, but the final RC should move
to
> > RC naming...
> >
> >
> > 2) The appendix in the readme.htm is out of date. It mentions some
> > > file locations for step 4, but there is no longer a step 4 and the
> > > locations are irrelevant now that we don't need to copy these files.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'll look into that..
> >
> >
> > 3) STATUS.txt still looks out of date.. The version at
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/STATUS has a full
> > > list of committers but this one does not
> >
> >
> >
> > The Status.txt is being updated frequently...this might be because
some
> > changes went in into the trunk version after I grabed a copy of it.
> >
> >
> > 4) Should the sample webapp include the derby jar? It seems reasonable
> > > since we are including SDO, EMF, etc. It would be nice if we didn't
> > > require users to copy this over.
> >
> >
> > I didn't explicitly add that there because the readme tells users to
grab
> > derby and then put the database in place and configure datasources, do
we
> > want to remove these instructions and ship derby together in the
samples ?
> >
> >
> > 5) Did we decide against changing the sample location from "bin" to
> > > something else? Does anyone else have an opinion on where this
should
> > > go? "bin" seems like a place for executables and scripts, not a war
> > > file.
> >
> >
> >
> > This was the only thing i didn't change in the structure, but if you
have
> > strong feelings to have this changed, i'll do it.
> >
> >
> > Brent
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/11/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > The DAS Java M2 Release Candidate is available at :
> > > >
> > > >      http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/das_java/RC2/<
http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/das_java/RC2/>
> > > >
> > > > Changes from DAS Java M2 - RC1
> > > >
> > > >   I have addressed most of issues from the feedback you guys gave
me
> > > on
> > > > RC1, see thread below :
> > > >
> > > >
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00242.html
> > > >
> > > > What's new in DAS Java M2
> > > >
> > > >   DAS Core features
> > > >
> > > >      - MySQL support
> > > >      - Static Data Objects
> > > >      - Dynamic root for static graphs
> > > >      - "Unique" attribute on relationships
> > > >      - Explicit ResultSet shape definition
> > > >      - Improved logging
> > > >      - Programmatic Configuration
> > > >      - Helper for empty SDO Graph
> > > >      - Convention over configuration
> > > >         - Column named "ID" is the PK
> > > >         - Column named "xxx_ID" is the FK to table "xxx"
> > > >
> > > >   DAS Samples
> > > >      - Tomcat integration and automated DAS samples testing
(htmlUnit)
> > > >      - DAS Samples now have all dependencies and source code
inside
> > > the
> > > > sample war
> > > >
> > > >   For detailed user documentation and feature descriptions, access
> > > Tuscany
> > > > DAS Wiki page
> > > >
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look at it and provide your feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to