..or how about just supporting introspection of one level of jars within
wars.... if jars are nested inside jars we don't look at them... will this
bring down the complexity a bit.. or would it actually not matter that much
...
- Venkat
On 10/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <snip>
>
> I think this goes back to what I describing earlier in this thread, if
> > we want to support WARs as a first class SCA contribution type we have
> > to consider artifacts stored in JARs under WEB-INF/lib as integral part
> > of the Web Archive like other artifacts in the WAR. We'll need to open
> > these JARs and process them like the rest of the artifacts in the WAR.
> >
> > Doing this will help Nishant and all others running Tuscany on WebLogic.
>
>
> Ok but from what was said earlier ("we would have to consider this
> carefully
> as allowing for nested archives may cause all kinds of complications") it
> doesn't sound like it will be a really quick thing to fix. It looks like
> WebLogic always creates a jar from the classes folder with a fixed name -
> _wl_cls_gen.jar - so how about just have some special case code to deal
> with
> that one specific jar for now just to get Tuscany running on WebLogic?
>
> ...ant
>
