+1 for using <implementation.web>.
Simon
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1, <implementation.web> would be good.
On Jan 15, 2008 6:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Peters wrote:
I have just been through the "get started in 10 minutes" and I like the
store example; it's small and neat. I was thinking of adapting it and
redoing it as a servlet, just to compare. I realise this is a backward
step in a way of course - instead of the AJAX style, back to page
refreshes, and running the code on the server. Nonetheless it would be
interesting to compare. Before I start, has anyone done it already?
Matthew Peters
That makes sense to me. You could define a new <implementation.servlet>
implementation type or try to implement the <implementation.web>
described at http://www.osoa.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3980.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
