Thanks for the encouragement, all. I'll let you know how I get on. This probably off topic for this list, but the choice between <implementation.web> and <implementation.servlet> is an interesting one. The page Jean-Sebastien refers to says that <implementation.web> is the current thinking, but <implementation.servlet> has its virtues too. It rather depends on whether you want the detail of the individual servlets exposed for configuration - would you want per servlet aspects like the servlet init parameters exposed as SCA properties for example? If you did, you might like something like <implementation.servlet name="<warfilename>#<servletname>"> <property name="currency">EURO</property> </implementation.servlet> In this case you could present currency to the servlet as a servlet init parameter.
This properly a topic for the place in OSOA where the SCA-JEE integration is discussed, of course, and I raised it as an issue there recently, though it has not been discussed yet. Matthew Peters Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16/01/2008 09:44 Please respond to [email protected] To [email protected] cc Subject Re: store example as a servlet? +1 for using <implementation.web>. Simon Luciano Resende wrote: > +1, <implementation.web> would be good. > > On Jan 15, 2008 6:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Matthew Peters wrote: >> >>>I have just been through the "get started in 10 minutes" and I like the >>>store example; it's small and neat. I was thinking of adapting it and >>>redoing it as a servlet, just to compare. I realise this is a backward >>>step in a way of course - instead of the AJAX style, back to page >>>refreshes, and running the code on the server. Nonetheless it would be >>>interesting to compare. Before I start, has anyone done it already? >>> >>>Matthew Peters >>> >> >>That makes sense to me. You could define a new <implementation.servlet> >>implementation type or try to implement the <implementation.web> >>described at http://www.osoa.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3980. >> >>-- >>Jean-Sebastien >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
