Hi Amita, Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these categories. I only did the ones I marked up from memory. Ex:IFF files must me ignored, but it must be clear from the rat report submitted in the release vote that thess files have been left as they are for this reason. You can see this kind of thing in Tuscany-1171, and in previous release vote threads, where the RAT report is manually marked up.
Kelvin. On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the action for Ex.IFF - ignore? Also what TBD for the xml files > under sdo-tools-test which do not contain headers - i.e. the > last section from RAT Report - Unresolved. > > Regards, > Amita > > On Jan 18, 2008 4:35 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've marked up the Unresolved section. There's a job to do to be sure > > that > > each of the instances marked with Ex:TCR is actually such. We also need > > to > > work out what to do to take account of the clarification to the OSOA > > license > > that happened recently, that the files marked Ex:3rd may need to be > > changed > > to be in line with. > > > > Kelvin. > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, > > > I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report > > > Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments about what is > > > appropriate to fix there. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Amita > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubatingand > > > > > keeping > > > > > ref. to the > > > > > old mail thread - > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. > > > > > I am starting a new thread now. > > > > > > > > > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places where small > > > updates > > > > > can > > > > > be done. Please give your comments > > > > > if these seem fine or need something more/something else. > > > > > > > > > > 1) why on > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe > > > > > have - > > > > > Open CSA (SCA Standards) > > > > > > > > > > > > This is confusing and needs investigating. I think you are talking > > > about > > > > the transition from ... > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html > > > > to > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html > > > > > > > > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the "general" menu > and > > > > therefore is general to Tuscany. However, the page is entitled > "SDO > > > > Java > > > > Get Involved", yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" page from > > the > > > > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact that this > page > > is > > > > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany". I'm sure we used to > have > > > our > > > > own SDO Java getting involved page, and I think it has accidentally > > > been > > > > overwritten at some stage. I guess we need to look at the wiki > change > > > > history and see if we can recover it. > > > > > > > > 2) changes in > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor > > > > > new features, improvements > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused here. I think maybe you have two separate ideas > > that > > > > have been merged perhaps. I don't think we want to detail new > > features > > > on > > > > the FAQ page. > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API > > > > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same name > > > > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on properties > > where > > > > > 'isMany' is true > > > > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest > > > > > > > > > > > > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other posting is > that > > > the > > > > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release. We haven't ever "released" > > the > > > > CTS, since it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so. SDO > > > > implementers > > > > who want to use the CTS can download the source. I think what we > want > > > to > > > > do > > > > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done before, for > the > > > SDO > > > > Java runtime. > > > > > > > > Is there anything else from > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project > > > > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned JIRAs useful > as > > > > part > > > > > of > > > > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will > > > > > be sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > I see now. Yes, release notes are definitely the place for this. > > > > > > > > 3) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlpage > > > does > > > > > not have menu > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point > > > > > > > > 4) > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno > > > > > menu , old structure > > > > > > > > > > > > you are right, we need to add a section for the lib project and the > > > > tools-test project > > > > > > > > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.html no menu > and > > > old > > > > > structure > > > > > > > > > > > > again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api project into > the > > > > main > > > > sdo trunk > > > > > > > > 6) developer guide - should we refer to > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland > > > > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete? > > > > > > > > > > > > I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new content from > the > > > sca > > > > guide into an sdo guide. If the SCA guide is built up by wiki > include > > > > directives, there may be scope for including generic chunks into out > > own > > > > guide. > > > > > > > > 7) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.htmlagain > > no > > > > > menu > > > > > can refer to > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > 8) TUSCANY-1026 > > > > > Also, why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html > > > > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as html? (like > > shows > > > > all > > > > > html tags etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a firefox issue. It's fine in IE. Not sure why it's > > > wrong > > > > in firefox though. > > > > > > > > Can we provide this link in > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content that I think > > is > > > > already in the site. It certainly was at one time. > > > > > > > > 9) TUSCANY-1531 > > > > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available on the left > > > menu > > > > on > > > > > this page : > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html > > > > > It should probably be listed/visible from : > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas > > > > > it's > > > > > one of the pages with more contents on it. > > > > > looks like is fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong styles : > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > fine > > > > > > > > Thanks Amita for this useful review. I'll pick some of these things > > up. > > > > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you would like me > > to > > > > do? > > > > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than welcome to > > pitch > > > > in > > > > too. > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
