Eric, Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supposed to be backward compatible. Have you tracked down exactly what class is missing and why?
Frank. Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/15/2008 03:36:49 PM: > David, > > EMF 2.2.3 is what I've been using also up until this point. My code > is integrating with a project that's already using EMF 2.4, so I > need to align with the larger project. Based on what I've seen so > far, it doesn't look like that's a possibility. > > > Thanks, > Eric > [image removed] "David Adcox" ---04/15/2008 03:10:11 PM---The latest > version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what is > currently specified in the > > [image removed] > From: > > [image removed] > "David Adcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [image removed] > To: > > [image removed] > [email protected] > > [image removed] > Date: > > [image removed] > 04/15/2008 03:10 PM > > [image removed] > Subject: > > [image removed] > Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4 > > > > > The latest version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what > is currently specified in the pom files. Is there a reason you need > to use a newer version of EMF? > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > Has anyone had any success running Java SDO with EMF 2.4? I'm running into > > a NoClassDefFoundError on SDOUtil.createHelperContext(). I've seen this on > > both the 1.0 and 1.1 releases. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
