Frank,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I got busy with some other
stuff that had to be done yesterday.

I've been debugging the problem all morning, and it seems to come down to a
NullPointerException from eStaticClass() in ReferenceImpl.  Here's the code
where I'm seeing the exception:

protected EClass eStaticClass()
{
   return SDOPackage.eINSTANCE.getReference();
}

SDOPackage.eINSTANCE is null, so SDOPackageImpl.init() is returning null
for some reason.  I'm not sure that really answers your question, but I
hope it's helpful.

Thanks,
Eric


|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                           
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |[email protected]                                                   
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |04/15/2008 04:28 PM                                                          
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4                                      
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Eric,

Theoretically EMF 2.4 should work, because it's supposed to be backward
compatible. Have you tracked down exactly what class is missing and why?

Frank.

Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/15/2008 03:36:49 PM:

> David,
>
> EMF 2.2.3 is what I've been using also up until this point. My code
> is integrating with a project that's already using EMF 2.4, so I
> need to align with the larger project. Based on what I've seen so
> far, it doesn't look like that's a possibility.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> [image removed] "David Adcox" ---04/15/2008 03:10:11 PM---The latest
> version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what is
> currently specified in the

>
> [image removed]
> From:
>
> [image removed]
> "David Adcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [image removed]
> To:
>
> [image removed]
> [email protected]
>
> [image removed]
> Date:
>
> [image removed]
> 04/15/2008 03:10 PM
>
> [image removed]
> Subject:
>
> [image removed]
> Re: Using Tuscany Java SDO with EMF 2.4
>
>
>
>
> The latest version I've been using is 2.2.3 - which I believe is what
> is currently specified in the pom files.  Is there a reason you need
> to use a newer version of EMF?
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Eric S Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Hello all,
> >
> >  Has anyone had any success running Java SDO with EMF 2.4?  I'm
running into
> >  a NoClassDefFoundError on SDOUtil.createHelperContext().  I've seen
this on
> >  both the 1.0 and 1.1 releases.
> >
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to