Very concise == neat solutions. Yummy. ;-) Thanks for your replies! Cheers!! Albert-Jan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --- On Wed, 1/13/10, Sander Sweers <[email protected]> wrote: From: Sander Sweers <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Tutor] samples on sort method of sequence object. To: "Albert-Jan Roskam" <[email protected]> Cc: "*tutor python" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 2:14 PM 2010/1/13 Albert-Jan Roskam <[email protected]> > > Interesting. Can this also be used to make sorting of alphanumerical list > items in a 'numerical' way easier? > >>> x > ['var_0', 'var_13', 'var_11', 'var_9', 'var_4', 'var_1', 'var_5', 'var_6', > 'var_7', 'var_14', 'var_2', 'var_3', 'var_8', 'var_10', 'var_12'] Yes. >>> x ['var_0', 'var_13', 'var_11', 'var_9', 'var_4', 'var_1', 'var_5', 'var_6', 'var_7', 'var_14', 'var_2', 'var_3', 'var_8', 'var_10', 'var_12'] >>> sorted(x, key=lamda x: int(x.strip('var_'))) SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> sorted(x, key=lambda x: int(x.strip('var_'))) ['var_0', 'var_1', 'var_2', 'var_3', 'var_4', 'var_5', 'var_6', 'var_7', 'var_8', 'var_9', 'var_10', 'var_11', 'var_12', 'var_13', 'var_14'] Greets Sander
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
