On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 08:22:16PM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote: > $ make > > ...Compiling Tux Paint from source... > src/tuxpaint.c:141: SDL_image.h: No such file or directory > src/tuxpaint.c:143: #error "-------------------------------------------------" > src/tuxpaint.c:144: #error "If you installed SDL_image from a package, be sure" > src/tuxpaint.c:145: #error "to get the development package, as well!" > src/tuxpaint.c:146: #error "(e.g., 'libsdl-image1.2-devel.rpm')" > src/tuxpaint.c:147: #error "--------------------------------------------------" > make: *** [obj/tuxpaint.o] Error 1 > > > Pretty cool, no? > > > Anyone see any problems with this method?
Aside from the rpm-centric message, nope :) > (who notices a complete lack of naming standards when it comes to the > SDL add-on libraries' header-file "#define"s... ;^) ) You too, eh? :) Ben -- ,-. nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] \`' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ` [ gpg 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ] [ pgp 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ] _______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev
