On Wednesday 15 September 2004 23:50, Bill Kendrick wrote: >On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:47:49PM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote: >> John P. grabbed Tux Paint Config from CVS and was able to build a Win32 >> version w/o any changes, apparently! :^) > ><snip> > >By the way... do you think we should packaged Tux Paint Config along with >Tux Paint itself, when building and releasing it for Windows (and Mac?) > 'Tux Paint Config' (308K) requires 'libintl.dll' (32K) and 'iconv.dll' (877K) which are packaged with 'Tux Paint'.
I think it would be a shame not to just bundle 'Tux Paint Config' with 'Tux Paint': one less download, a smaller total download (if 'Tux Paint Config' included required DLLs) and an increased chance of people actually using it. The Windows installer could be tweaked to create shortcuts/menu items etc. The fact that they are separate in cvs is a good thing and unrelated to how they are packaged. Just my 2 cents, cheers, John. >What about for Linux? Should there be a 'tuxpaint-config' packaged, >separate from 'tuxpaint' and 'tuxpaint-stamps'? Or should it also be >included in the RPM, DEB, TGZ, etc. packages? > >-bill! >_______________________________________________ >Tuxpaint-dev mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev _______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev
