On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 11:37, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote: > Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > Take a look at the bridge drawing in the gallery. > > It would look better with a darker red. > > I'm not sure. And Bill actually *has* used a darker red in parts > of the drawing. > > > Also consider blood. > > I'd rather not. It's normal for kids. Just a month or two ago, my 18-month-old exposed his skull. (2mm by 10mm chunk of flesh removed) Schoolboys bleed profusely from the nose and knees. > >> I really think this blue is much more usuable than the old > >> one, especially for drawing cartoon skys. > > > > Try the lightening bolt stamp in a baby-blue sky. > > Now, doesn't that look horribly wrong? > > No. And I think it looks fine even with these very different > shades of blue: > > http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/tuxpaint/gallery/billkendrick/20041212203112.png That's very cartoon-like. Real lightning bolts appear white. I made the stamp colorable for cartoon usage, but really, a lightning bolt should be white. Without any prompting from me, my kid makes them white. (no cartoons in this house) Another thing: a rainbow in a baby-blue sky looks garish. > And of course using a different set of images you would get a > different 'sky blue' colour. Just look at all the different > colours of the sky behind the real Golden Gate: If you'd like me to recompute, I can. > What do other people on this list think? I've put up two images > for comparison: That's a total garish cartoon. Look, we have a "Cartoon" item in the magic section. Hack that to produce the color you want. There is no "Uncartoon" magic tool. > >>> 4. washed out dark blue > >> > >> I've made it darker. Better? The old one was *too* dark to be > >> usuable. > > > > For what? > > Stamp tinting, for instance. See attached car, tinted with the old blue.
<<attachment: blue.png>>
_______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list Tuxpaint-dev@tux4kids.net http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev
