On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 06:19:14PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > > xpaint, installed right now on my debian-unstable box
Which Tux Paint is a replacement for, in some people's eyes ;^) > PDF and Postscript viewers tend to demand the middle > button for panning. (not the KDE or GNOME ones) Those are old, ugly, crufty, and IMHO, depcerated. :^) Even Adobe's latest Acrobat Viewer for Linux was ugly and wonky, but that was version 5. They're beta-testing version 7 as we speak. I'm assuming they'll have switch to a more sane UI like Qt or GTK+ by now. :^) <snip> > It's probably a Swing vs. AWT thing. Uhh... yeah, sure! ;^) (I know VERY little about Java right now, obviously.) > > I'm going to keep it the way it is now. Sorry! :^) > > > > (If you REALLY want, you can add a "--nomousebuttondistinction" switch, > > or something, to revert it to the old way ;) ) > > I just want an #ifdef WIN32, not an option. I'd rather have it work, more or less, the same across all systems. Having to document how the mouse works on one OS versus another seems silly. :^/ > I'll wait until the bug reports come in. Heh, I'll consider the above your 'bug report' and work on an option for you (and others with kids so young that they don't want to care about the distinction between the buttons). It's a similar situation to why we have the scrollwheel-disabling code, so... -bill! _______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev
