> Hi Ben, > > > If Tuxtype2 is meant to supercede Tuxtype, I don't see the point in me > > changing the package name in Debian. I have talked to the DD who > > currently does tuxtype and we have agreed to: > > The name of the "program" really is "TuxTyping2" as on the menu/titlescreen! So not > changing the package name is no big deal really. And for you guys I would think that > its just a good idea since doing that keeps your users from having to change the way > they apt-get tuxtype!
My two cents: New package called "tuxtype2" (or whatever) and leave tuxtype1 in there as long as desired (I know of at least two different schools based on DebianJr. that are keeping tuxtype1 around simply because tt2 is too new and plays a bit too fast on their machines). > > Also, I'm contemplating packaging Tux of Math Command. I'll be > > looking at it after I get a preliminary Tuxtype2 package working so > > OSEF can make use of it for their ISO. > > I'm sure Bill K. will be glad to hear that! I'd /love/ to see Math Command packaged. -- Sam Hart University/Work addr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Personal addr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alternative <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> end _______________________________________________ Tuxtype-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxtype-dev
