begin quote: On 03-06-09, Sam Hart wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > > If Tuxtype2 is meant to supercede Tuxtype, I don't see the point in me > > > changing the package name in Debian. I have talked to the DD who > > > currently does tuxtype and we have agreed to: > > > > The name of the "program" really is "TuxTyping2" as on the menu/titlescreen! So > > not changing the package name is no big deal really. And for you guys I would > > think that its just a good idea since doing that keeps your users from having to > > change the way they apt-get tuxtype! > > My two cents: New package called "tuxtype2" (or whatever) and leave > tuxtype1 in there as long as desired (I know of at least two different > schools based on DebianJr. that are keeping tuxtype1 around simply because > tt2 is too new and plays a bit too fast on their machines).
Then again, now that I think about it, these two schools are using Debian testing.... so by just replacing tt2 with tt2 in unstable (and it taking a while to get into testing) you wont be affecting these two groups (and any others like them). -- Sam Hart University/Work addr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Personal addr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alternative <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> end _______________________________________________ Tuxtype-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxtype-dev
