On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:36 AM, David Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't set a bar for factual accuracy on a show with a primary > purpose of being entertaining (as opposed to informative) high enough > for me to limbo under, even if the show is non-fiction, and I'm kind > of surprised that someone who worked in the industry would set it as > high as you appear to have.
The argument can be made that my days working in the industry were numbered BECAUSE I set the bar high. As for not demanding factual accuracy on shows (even shows whose ultimate purpose is to entertain) set in the real world... I don't even know where to begin to respond to that statement. I mean, why do reality shows exist if not to attempt to capture reality (in a hopefully entertaining way)? I used to really enjoy "The Real World," back when all they did was cast seven strangers to live in a house and live their lives. Though the editing created specific biases, the concept was a unique experiment combining people from all facets of American life. Once "The Real World" started giving the seven strangers specific jobs and challenges, I lost interest, because, by and large, it resulted in seven strangers running around a city like idiots, offending the locals and making fools of themselves for cash and prizes. I thought the first season of Big Brother was decent, before producers started inciting conflict and outright hatred between the contestants. I find people in general to be entertaining, with their own personal histories and stories to tell. The trumped up antics found on shows like "Survivor" hold no interest to me at all. My argument against ridiculously premised reality shows is the same argument I have against recreational drug use. I find reality, and the people I encounter in real life, to be much more interesting and entertaining than the typical lunkheaded reality show contestant. I see people giving a damn about who gets evicted from the "Big Brother" house, when they don't give a damn when their own next door neighbor gets evicted. I see people cry when a D-list celebrity gets voted off of "Dancing with the Stars," but those same people refuse to watch the news because it is too depressing. I don't understand that. Maybe I set the bar too high. Forgive me, but maybe it is others who set the bar way too low. -- Kevin M. (RPCV) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Like TV only smarter. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
