http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29402296/

...both have been compared to Kenneth the Page on 30 Rock.

I thought Jindal was bad, but I did not realize so many republicans
would agree. David Brooks went medieval on his ass, calling his
arguments "insane" and a "disaster for the Republican Party".

Non-Republicans thought it was bad too - my favorite line was from a
certain Nobel Prize winning economist (providing this post with yet
another TV tie-in to justify it) who wrote that the kind of arguments
Jindal was making (e.g. the Governor of the State which contains New
Orleans bitching about spending relatively few dollars to improve
early warnings for volcano eruptions) are turning the Republican Party
into "the party of Beavis and Butthead".
(http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/what-should-government-do-a-jindal-meditation/)

Some democrats are being a little too quick to predict Jindal's
political demise - after all, Bill Clinton gave a very embarrassing
(and long) speech at the 1988 Democratic Convention that was supposed
to be his political coming out party, and he was able to survive that.
One way Clinton came back from that was to go on TV and make fun of
himself (and let others make fun of him). Jindal really needs to do
that - and PDQ (Clinton did not have to worry about yahoo and
facebook). Jindal should get himself booked on Dave next week, let
Dave tease him, show he can laugh at himself, and then say something
like "I may have proven that I am not as entertaining a public speaker
as President Obama, but the point I was making about too much
government spending is still important (bla bla bla).

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
TV or Not TV .... Smart (TV) People on Ice!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to