> I see this is not a popular show on this list, so I guess I won't get
> an answer to this question - but what I was left wondering was whether
> the shot of the white shoe was intended as an injection of ambiguity
> into the end of the series, a la the UK version, or just a cute call
> back? I would like the show better if it were the former, although if
> that was their intent it was not nearly effective enough.

I think perhaps its more a show that some just gave up on. I gave LOM 
2-3 shows and it just didn't ever become a "must see" for me. And the 10 
p.m. slot is more a DVD review/purchased TV season DVD/Netflix time for 
me as I wait for Letterman/Ferguson.

I still have the LOM finale to watch on the DVR (having stumbled onto 
spoilers of the secret) and may get to it. Sometime.

What else have I given up on (at least for now)?
        Lost
        Cupid (just not an improvement on the old series.)
        Heroes
        24
        Is Deal or no Deal primetime still on?
        Parks and Recreation
        Survivor (long ago)
        Chuck
        Lie to Me.

My Name is Earl is an occasional view depending on the guest star and 
whether they're still actually doing The List.

Kings became a stack up on DVR show and ultimately deleted them all.

Not sure when I'll be in the mood for Southland...

The Unusuals? Meh. Must everything have a conspiracy subplot? It worked 
so well on Knight Rider. I guess they've hired the writer of Middleman. 
(Something I never watched.) Dare I hope they adjust the tone from the 
mood swingy pilot into more the stories that would become cases on 
Boston Legal?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
TV or Not TV .... Smart (TV) People on Ice!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to