> There's a reason the site firejoemorgan.com was launched: Morgan is > someone who has never let the facts get in the way of a good story. > He's from the camp that believes the new influx of data and statistics > is awful for the game, dismissing it on more than one occasion....
Most announcers, if you see enough of them, become tiresome. Comments that were insightful the first time you heard them become trite by the twentieth or two hundreth repetition. (It's how John Madden seemed to become a caricature of himself.) ESPN's problem, of course, is that it has to fill time, be it an hour of SportsCenter or 24 hours of programming. So coverage of a game you really care about is followed by something you don't care about, and the 2001 game that the NFL Network is replaying may or may not be of interest. As PGage pointed out, ESPN is still the obvious place to go to find out what's happening in sports, despite a couple of attempts to compete with it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
