But he's not the lead in Burn Notice. So it could be a possibility. What would be the perfect age range for the new jim rockford?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Even better than Nathan, but unfortunately just as unavailable, would be > Bruce Campbell. > > Doug Fields > Tampa, FL > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [TV orNotTV] Re: 'House' creator to revive 'Rockford' at NBC > From: Jon Delfin <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, July 30, 2009 11:27 am > To: [email protected] > > > Nathan Fillion isn't available. Anybody care to imagine who else might > play Rockford 2.0? > > jd > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Bob in Jersey<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > The Jim Garner detec-a-tive hour was the only classic show David Shore > > would ever want to adapt... Steve Carell's company is involved, so the > > lightheartedness should remain... > > > > http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118006650.html?categoryid=14&cs=1 > > > > > > -- > > BOB > > > > > > > > > > -- Jason Carpio [email protected] Not sent from an iPhone --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
