You got nearly the same version that we did in the UK!

I can't remember the last time the BAFTAs were actually broadcast live in
the UK. They're nearly always on some kind of delay. This year they didn't
start until 9pm on TV when in reality they began at around 7pm.

We had those same seven awards cut which I think is pretty appalling. Some
of them are quite big awards. They seem to have been the awards in the 7-8pm
hour.

I think the reasons are to do with concern about swearing and the overall
length of the show. But you're right that it's awful.

We were just lucky this year that there weren't any really awful technical
glitches. In 2008 the sound was awful, and in 2009 as well as clunky
editing, there was the worst edited sequence for Terry Gilliam that I've
ever seen for his induction into the academy. It was as though they used the
first attempt at an edit with repeated sequences and so on.

The real pointlessness is that all the relevant news sites, blogs, Facebook
and Twitter were alive with the winners well before they'd been aired. In a
24 hour socially-connected world this makes putting a delay on awards
ludicrous. Something I understand the US networks are learning for their
award shows.



Adam


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Jon Delfin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I miss the days when BBC America would air the BAFTAs live and uncut
> to the U.S. at 3 p.m. ET.
>
> Now we get a hamhandedly edited version in prime time. Seven of the 25
> awards were cut from the broadcast (Music, Sound, Cinematography,
> Editing, Short Animation, Short Film and Outstanding British
> Contribution to Cinema), and several thank-yous were chopped with a
> cleaver. The director of "A Prophet" and his translator were charming
> and funny until they were yanked, and Mark Boal was given one sentence
> in his acceptance of the Best Film award. More curious, emcee Jonathan
> Ross introduced that category by saying there were two awards to go --
> but Best Film was the last one shown.
>
> One more demerit for BBCA.
>
> jd
>
> --
> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

Reply via email to