thanks -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jon Delfin Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: Why these were the worst Oscars ever
Jaime Weinman wrote about it (third graf): http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/08/and-the-winner-was/ jd On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Pollak, Melissa F. <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't think the show was the "worst Oscars ever." > > But I have one question that I don't think has been discussed here yet: > > When and why did they go back to "the winner is" instead of "and the > Oscar goes to"? I heard only one of the latter. > > Not that it really makes any difference, but I was just curious. > Anyone see this change noted and discussed? > > BTW, I'm currently in Raleigh - for the filming of HWCNBN's PBS special. > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To > unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
