On May 17, 9:34 pm, "Kevin M." <[email protected]> wrote: > Long winded piece that didn't say much except to summarize what had > already been said. And I still agree with PGage that none of the > big-named writers has taken the media or Leno to task for the > inaccurate theory that Conan's ratings were the problem when evidence > indicates Jay's ratings led to the insanity.
Seems Zehme did just that: "Ratings blew, thus gutting lead-in momentum for local affiliate newscasts, which resultantly began tanking hard (despite Leno’s appalling crossover shill: 'Your local news starts now!'), which ultimately destroyed the valiant Coco smack in the middle of freshman curriculum." I guess it would help to actually read the article. And not judge it on, say, ads that precede it. > > One clear difference between the two Bills is that Carter names names. > This piece is filled with unnamed sources. I don't like unnamed > sources. I didn't like them before my current work situation, and I > truly loath them now. > -- > Kevin M. (who will gladly send a resume to anyone who is hiring) > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
