The whole situation of L&O's cancellation has been bothering me. I see no reason why it should have been canceled.
• Have they run out of NY crime stories? Please! Just open the NY Daily News or NY Post. • Have the locales become too familiar? I've lived here my whole life and continually find new and interesting places, and I'm just talking about Manhattan. • Have the cast become too expensive? Change them. One thing that has marked the L&O franchise's enduring success is that the players can be changed at any time. • Too expensive to shoot in NYC? I'd argue about the talent pool of principal actors and especially background actors that all have an L&O credit on their resumes from one time or another. Besides, dropping the expense of NY for the expense of L.A.? Really?? Stories, locale, talent and a 20 season pedigree -- to drop L&O prime, and keep other L&O spin-offs just doesn't make sense to me. Ron Casalotti Wayne, NJ On Jul 7, 10:40 pm, Wesley McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > The first two sentences from NY Magazine's Vulture > blog:http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/law_order_amc.html > > AMC has already shown its propensity for zombies with its upcoming thriller > series *The Walking Dead*. And now comes word that the network has shown > some interest in another stumbling corpse: *Law & Order*. > > -- > Wesley McGeehttp://www.ambivi.comhttp://sterlingnorth.vox.com -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
