On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Mark J. <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 11:23 am, David Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:29, Mark J. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > However, politicians or pundits have not particularly done well on > > > "Dancing" in the past.... Why is it working this time? > > > > Because Sarah Palin's people are different sort of crazy/ devoted/ > > (insert your preferred word here) than Tom DeLay's people? > > I think you've got something there. > > And I find it humorous that the teabaggers have been able to do (even > if unwittingly) what Howard Stern, a raft of other radio DJs and > several bloggers and decriers of the evils of reality television have > been unable to do--throw a monkey wrench into a talent competition > show. (SNIP) > I have not been following this thread, and have never seen this program, but this last post caught my eye and I wanted to get clear on something. Are you saying that it is obvious to most that Bristol (at first I thought this thread had something to do with ESPN) is a bad dancer, and is being kept on because of her novelty value, or because of her mother's partisans? Or is there a critical mass of relatively politically neutral viewers who just think she is one of the better dancers on the show? -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
