Richard Roeper was at the Chicago show, and his tweets (and column today) 
suggest that while not as bad as Detroit, it still sucked pretty hard.


http://www.suntimes.com/news/roeper/4639463-452/doing-standup-charlie-sheens-out-of-his-league.html


As for Clooney, he did have to figure out what films worked for him and what 
didn't (and he did the Killer Tomatoes flick pre-"ER").  Once he did (by "Out 
of 
Sight" if not sooner), it's been a remarkable string.

David




________________________________
From: PGage <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Charlie Sheen Booed Off Stage in Detroit


Sheen's Chicago stop was much better recieved: http://tinyurl.com/3usqg2p (AP 
story from Yahoo). See also: 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-live-0404-charlie-sheen-live-20110403,0,4324207.column

 
Looks like the main change he made was having a host ask him questions, rather 
than trying to free ball it with long ranting monologues. This was a much 
better 
idea for him. My only exposre to Sheen since Major League have been his two 
interviews with Dan Patrick, the first the leading edge of his recent pop 
culture fame as a deconstructing celebrity. I was surprised that I was mildly 
interested in him, and it was almost all because he was reacting to the 
questions and comments from Patrick, who also provided needed structure, 
interrupting him and bringing him back on task as needed. I still would not pay 
money, or leave my house, or put on my pants, to go see Sheen, but the only way 
his "act" can be anything more than just a freak show is if he has some 
boundaries to traverse, and some structure to keep him roughly foucsed.
 
The most interesting bit in the Tribute story for me was this: "He acknowledged 
being jealous of George Clooney and how Clooney's movies always seem to work". 
Say what you will about Clooney, he is not a more succesful version of Sheen, 
he 
is in many ways the opposite of Sheen. Clooney is professional, respectful of 
his peers (both actors and crew). He is about having a good time (and no doubt 
gets more, and higher quality, sex than a bottom feeder like Sheen) but is also 
well prepared and ready to work. Clooney's film's work because he knows who he 
is, he respects what he does and the people who do it with him, and he is good 
at it. 

-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

Reply via email to