On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:47 AM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > > The 7:30 idea, while the best, is also the hardest to implement, for the > reasons Kevin suggests - but not impossible. It would take pressure from the > FCC to find its balls and enforce the broadcaster's responsibility to serve > the public interest.
This just isn't going to happen. As I participate in environmental grass roots work and observe government policy and private business in other spheres, it has become clear over the last number of years that large private businesses will make policy as they see fit and government agencies will not intervene unless there is already a long record of close oversight or a huge groundswell of public pressure to make a specific change. Since the FCC does not currently hold the networks to any meaningful effort to serve the public interest there's no long record of close oversight. And there is no indication that the public could ever get worked up enough or mobilized to press the FCC to order the networks to change how or at what time they present the news. We also have no idea if CBS will keep their savings from Couric's salary in CBS News. They might pay the new anchor $2 mil and use the rest in some other part of the company. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
