On Jul 5, 4:17 pm, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > I caught an alert on CNN.com that the verdict was about to come in, so > turned on the TV to watch it. I have not followed this case closely, but > closely enough to expect a guilty verdict from such a short deliberation. > Based on what I know I am pleased with the verdict, as every time a > defendant that most of the public thinks is probably guilty is found not > guilty due to a failure of the state to meets its burden of proof, our > system of justice is strengthened (we don't rule by mob law). The "smell > evidence" bordered on, if not crossed over into, junk science, and the sense > that she murdered her baby rested mostly on the perception that she was a > lying, self-indulgent, narcissistic woman-child. We may not like her, we may > suspect she intentionally killed her child, but we need to meet a higher > standard than that to deprive her of liberty and life. > > As important for me was the comments of her lawyers in the post-verdict > press conference, tearing the TV legal commentators a new asshole for their > ignorant and self-aggrandizing commentary. On CNN Jeffrey Toobin made a > point of noting (seemingly against the wishes of whoever was anchoring their > coverage) that they were talking specifically about Nancy Grace, (who > apparently but not surprisingly single-handedly turned this case into a > circus).
And after taking the high road on Pelley and "The Early Show," CBS News is devoting a special "48 Hours Mystery" tonight at 10 to the Anthony trial. I'm sure it'll do better than a "Good Wife" rerun and handily beat "Combat Hospital" and the last hour of "America's Got Talent." -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
