On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is the fact Morgan has committed unethical acts across the pond > only now making news? We chatted about this the day Morgan was > announced as King's replacement -- how long ago was that? > > That he might not be guilty of the most-recent allegations doesn't > negate previous wrong-doings that cost him employment and credibility. > > http://news.yahoo.com/morgans-past-resurfaces-begins-cnn-232826547.html > I have never had any context for Piers Morgan, and do not understand why CNN wanted to hitch their wagon to him. But there is a difference between sleazy and unethical practices, which he seems to have admitted (and rationalized by arguing that everyone was doing them) and the illegal practices at the core of the current investigations. MP Louise Mensch dragged Morgan back into this with her questions of the Murdochs (apparently based on misinformation), and now older reports are getting rehashed. So far CNN believes Morgan when he says he was a sleaze, not a crook. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
