On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Dave Sikula <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been to a couple of WWDTM tapings and memory tells me that most > of what ends up on the cutting-room floor is the guest interview. > > I like the show a lot (am also a former winner of Carl's voice), but > could understand the general lack of love from the reviewers (most of > the criticism seemed to be that it isn't hip or edgy enough, but > that's not what it's trying to be). (SNIP) > As long as you imagine Arlene Francis and Bennett Cerf playing the game, WWDTM is not that disappointing. If you have Stewart or Colbert in your head, you will feel like it is a waste of time. I am a little surprised they did not have the panelists were gloves and bow ties for television. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
