Not to mention that SCOTUSBlog has no SC press credential. That's just old media thinking.
Thanks Joe. Sent from my phone. Joe Hass <[email protected]> wrote: >And having finished reading it, I cannot stress enough: if you have >*any* interest in how TV news works, read this from top to bottom. If >this isn't the best piece of journalism about journalism this year, >whatever beats it is gonna have a helluva bar to clear. > >On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Joe Hass <[email protected]> wrote: >> The good folks at SCOTUSblog have a 7500-word epic on how CNN and Fox >> cocked it up, complete with far more information than you'd ever want >> to know. I'm only up to the start of the reading of the opinion, and >> I've already learned how my thought of how this worked was way off >> (they started handing out the printed decision as soon as Justice >> Roberts started to read it). >> >> http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/07/were-getting-wildly-differing-assessments/ > >-- >TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "TV or Not TV" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected] >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
