While I won't dispute the notion that traditional media tries to keep SCOTUSBlog out, it struck me as plausible that the Court doesn't know what to do with bloggers. They still don't have cameras (though I'm agnostic as to whether that's a good idea or not). And the lack of preparation for their website also suggests they don't get it or don't want to get it.
David ________________________________ From: Tom Wolper <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2012 5:05 PM Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] SCOTUS Obamacare Ruling Provides Sorkin More Material On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:39 PM, David Bruggeman <[email protected]> wrote: > Not to mention that SCOTUSBlog has no SC press credential. That's just old > media thinking. Old media seems to have the pull to keep any possible competitors from getting credentials. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
