On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:43 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:22 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Lance Armstrong to sit down with Oprah - perhaps to come clean on >>> Doping, Lies, Bullying and Threats and Attempted Bribery? >>> >>> >>> http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/08/armstrong-set-to-appear-on-oprah-next-week-as-new-allegation-surfaces/?partner=rss&emc=rss >>> >> >> Lance has clearly hired himself one of those "image specialists." >> Frankly, I prefer it when he is a guilty, 'roid taking a-hole to the >> manufactured, contrite puddle he is poised to become. >> > > We know you are principally opposed to apologies. >
Just so we're clear, I'm opposed to insincere apologies. I don't believe any thinking individual thinks Armstrong feels bad about the choices he has made (except perhaps the decisions that led to his break up with Sheryl Crow). > > Assuming all world class cyclists have doped over the last couple of > decades, Lance would still be the best of his generation (lots of assholes > have been great athletes). > They have, and Lance is -- Kevin M. (RPCV) -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
