I was looking in the article for the obvious disclaimer.

None to be found.

Strange. You'd think that with a week's worth of omelettes worth of egg all 
over their face, they'd take due diligence seriously. At least in the interim.

~D
... and now I want omelettes.

---- Bob in Jersey <[email protected]> wrote: 
> And back in the court hearing the underlying suit that spawned this 
> rejection, CBS amended the action to add the charge that Dish failed to 
> disclose existence of AutoHop while negotiating retrans fees in 2011... 
> CNET<http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57565546-93/cbs-claims-dish-concealed-autohop-ad-skipping-technology/>(!)
> 
> -- BOB
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
> 
> 

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en


Reply via email to