On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, David Bruggeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Over at Ebert's pages.... > > http://blogs.suntimes.com/shales/2013/03/leno_late_night_me.html > > More a collection of observations than a cohesive argument for or against > something. YMMV. I find it interesting, or perhaps just rare, that Shales > appears to have something not-so-nice to say about someone associated with > Saturday Night Live. > > There is some scrambling to try and keep this story going. Aggregator > sites have been trying to make hay out of both Conan and Jay having nothing > in their monologues last night about this whole deal. > Well, I think a more descriptive Subject Header would have been "Shales weighs in on Tom Shales stuff", which is fine. He is writing on a web site and not using up paper or taking people's money, so he can write whatever he wants. I do wonder what Fallon did to get on his bad side - I suspect it is the crime of being under 60. I am no big Fallon-booster, but I have not seen any evidence to support the allegation that he is a conniving ambitious careerist who is angling for Leno's chair. To the contrary, he seems to be a pretty eager puppy dog who is happy to work hard and get whatever scraps NBC wants to dish out to him - which is my theory as to why NBC wants to promote him so quickly - he will work for cheap. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
