On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:39 AM, David Bruggeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This L.A. Times article ran in the WaPo's Sunday Style section today. > > > http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-lorne-michaels-jimmy-fallon-tonight-show-20130406,0,3304452.story > > Given the focus on Lorne's role in late night, there would seem to be a > topic and person that's glaringly absent. That said, I think we're at or > past saturation on this topic until next year. > Right now there is a small set of facts and all anybody can offer is countless ways of putting those facts together to turn it into a new story. I'm going to assume that more facts will be revealed at the upfronts, probably the fate of the 12:35 slot. I don't know who you mean is glaringly absent. Leno? Chevy Chase (as a Lorne Michaels alum who failed in late night)? Near the end of the article Jeffrey McCall expressed a reservation over giving Michaels control over so much time during the programming week. I agree but not for the same reason. Michaels has his own vision of what funny TV looks like and who is funny. The entire late night schedule for a network shouldn't be accountable to one producer's vision. Too much gets excluded. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
