On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Joe Hass <[email protected]> wrote:
> Elle does an annual "Women of Hollywood" edition which features multiple > covers of various stars. This year one of the stars is Melissa > McCarthy. Unfortunately, the photo is … well, you remember the Kate Upton > cover of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue this year? Yeah: it's the > exact opposite of that. > > > http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/10/15/melissa_mccarthy_in_elle_the_magazine_put_the_plus_size_comedian_on_its.html > I think I am missing the source of the outrage apparently felt by Slate. Here is the SI photo of Upton Joe referred to: http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/kate-upton-2013-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover.jpg Do we really think Ms. McCarthy should somehow have been photographed like that? I think she looks great on the Elle cover. If the outrage is that she did not make the newstand cover, well, it looks like three other skinny girls missed out on that too - and as Slate itself notes, it is possible Elle missed a bet, since McCarthy may have sold more magazines. I don't think Elle deserves any special notice for including McCarthy, but neither would I give them any special criticism for not photographing her the same way they do Penelope Cruz. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
